The Supreme Court’s term ends with a rash of divisive rulings

A judges gavel in the colours of the US flag with a fragmented handle

2024-07-04  1407  困难

Justice Barrett’s downplaying of that case was misplaced. In her dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson contended that the decision magnified the fallout from Loper Bright v Raimondo, the case that spelt the demise of the Chevron doctrine. This might have been the most important rule governing government that most Americans had never heard of—until the court struck it down this term too. “The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies” would empower plaintiffs to challenge long-settled regulations issued by federal agencies, she warned, and could “devastate the functioning of the federal government”.

经济学人和华尔街日报的文章是会员专属

请加入会员以继续阅读完整文章

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。