GUARDIAN  |  Opinion

Democrats have a constitutional power they aren’t using to fight back: state resolutions

民主党拥有一项未被利用的宪法权力来反击:州决议

‘The sentiment that ICE abuses have aroused has combined with an overwhelming sense of betrayal on the economy to foster a combustible anti-Trump feeling.’

‘The sentiment that ICE abuses have aroused has combined with an overwhelming sense of betrayal on the economy to foster a combustible anti-Trump feeling.’

2026-02-03  2524  晦涩
字体大小

The resolutions were not incidental to US politics. The practice of instructing senators was taken up by the antislavery movement beginning in the crisis over the admission of Missouri as a slave state in 1821. Northern state legislatures intervened with resolutions in the 1830s instructing members of the Senate as well as the House of Representatives to protest the gag rule by which the southern congressional leaders suppressed antislavery petitions. On the other side, slave states passed resolutions condemning abolitionists and favoring suppression of antislavery literature. After the Mexican War, northern states passed resolutions urging the prohibition of slavery in the territories through a measure called the Wilmot Proviso, which never passed. Congressman Abraham Lincoln voted in favor of it numerous times and declared himself a “Proviso Man”. That idea became the central platform of the new Republican party on which Lincoln was elected in 1860.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。