GUARDIAN | Opinion
No, private schools aren’t victims of ‘reverse discrimination’ – and Cambridge should know better
不，私立学校并非“反向歧视”的受害者 —— 剑桥应该更明白这一点
‘The dials of opportunity are all pointing in the wrong direction – not least the gap in elite university enrolments between private and state schools.’ Tourists punting on the River Cam, close to Trinity Hall’s Jerwood Library. <br>
2026-01-10 998词 中等
The words “reverse discrimination” are jarring. Whatever the intentions behind Trinity Hall’s policy, singling out a tiny cadre of already highly resourced schools sends a powerful signal: that academic quality is most reliably found there, and moving beyond this clique risks lowering standards. In a society marked by extreme inequalities in wealth, schooling and opportunity, the claim that these institutions are the victims of discrimination would be difficult to sustain – even by the cleverest of Cambridge dons.
免责声明：本文来自网络公开资料，仅供学习交流，其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。