GUARDIAN  |  Opinion

The Guardian view on microplastics research: questioning results is good for science, but has political consequences

《卫报》观点:质疑微塑料研究结果有利于科学,但带来政治后果

‘The questions raised are mainly about the measurement of quantities of micro- or nanoplastic in the human body.’

‘The questions raised are mainly about the measurement of quantities of micro- or nanoplastic in the human body.’

2026-01-18  569  中等
字体大小

The questions raised are mainly about the measurement of quantities of micro- or nanoplastic in the human body. In particular, one method, pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, may have either been used or interpreted incorrectly. There is still robust evidence via other methods – such as electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – that these small-scale plastics are in our organs. What is in doubt now is how much.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。