Ms. Harris: The Second Amendment does not prohibit the government from temporarily disarming habitual marijuana users. . . . The government must show a historical analogue that is relevantly similar and why and how it restricts Second Amendment rights. Here, that’s habitual drunkard laws. Under historical vagrancy and civil commitment laws, habitual drunkards were imprisoned or confined without specific dangerousness findings based on judgments that habitual drunkards as a class threatened public safety. . . .